Premilla Bundhoo
| Guest |
Monday, March 3, 2008 at 8:29 AM |
How did Allan Christensen arrive at the answer to Albert Einstein's riddle
| Guest |
Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 10:22 PM |
He a liein bitch dat f_ckin idiot copied me
| Guest |
Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 10:22 PM |
bitch
| Guest |
Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 10:24 PM |
A bitter guest once said to me,
'Why are you liein?' to which I replied
Do you mean 'lying?', then happily
the guest departed with his potty mouth.
| Guest |
Friday, June 20, 2008 at 12:21 PM |
i dunno but i just did it and got it right..im 13 it took me 1.5 hours
| Guest |
Monday, July 7, 2008 at 5:34 PM |
yeah all i did was simple start with the colors and went on to the nationalitites then drink,smoke,then pet. it was easy and im only 15
| Guest |
Monday, July 7, 2008 at 5:35 PM |
oh yeah i also used a chart if that helps
| Guest |
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 at 11:09 AM |
I don't think his answer is right. There is no evidence stating that any of the people owned fish. I mean the German could have owned Monkeys and then no one would have owned fish. We are assuming that someone owned fish. I do not think that that is a valid assumption.
Answer: "If any one of the 5 people in the five houses owned fish, it would have to be the German. But he could also have any animal as a pet except for cats, birds, dogs, and horses."
| dmallord |
Saturday, July 19, 2008 at 3:17 PM |
i solved it from the street perspective, and so the left reference reversed, comes out as the dane has the fish!
| Guest |
Sunday, August 31, 2008 at 4:42 PM |
German has the fish no doubts !!
| Guest |
Friday, September 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM |
no... really it is a very logical riddle i answered just in an hour ... you just have to find opposing statements and statements which agree to other statements without opposing another.. just like that.. i did not assume anything..
| Guest |
Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 3:48 AM |
15 mins flat !
| Guest |
Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 6:25 AM |
u cant have the dane owning the fish, and similarly, theres no way to infer that the german had fish either, he could have had anything
| Curtis |
Friday, February 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM |
Read the question. It clearly implies that *somebody* owns a fish.
If you choose to ignore that important bit of information only because it isn't explicitly stated, you will not be able to solve the problem. But if your prone to that sort of tunnel-vision, I suspect you will have much greater difficulties in life than not being able to solve this riddle.
| Guest |
Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 12:12 AM |
i rape logic puzzles for breakfast
| dmallord |
Tuesday, March 24, 2009 at 11:25 AM |
green | blue | white | yellow | red
norwegian | german | swede | dane | brit
coffee | water | milk | tea | beer
pall mall | prince | blends | dunhill | bluemaster
birds | cats | dog | fish | horses
the dane has the fish.
| Guest |
Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 9:58 PM |
Took me five minutes , Pure logic. Just think it through. German is the only logical awsner.
| Guest |
Friday, September 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM |
I did it in 20min...its not that hard.
